My saddening experience with r/atheism

Just four days after Jen McCreight wrote about awful comments being made about her by people on the r/atheism group on Reddit I logged into my website stats and noticed a huge amount of hits from r/atheism, and my heart sank. Especially when I read the link through which people were hitting my site:

http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/smwu8/vote_is_hayley_stevens_a_stupid_british_cunt_id/

Yes. That’s right. A user named ‘BoomBoomPie’ signed up to the site to make a post asking ‘Vote: Is Hayley Sevens a stupid British cunt. I’d say yes’ and further on into the post they explained their statement by stating:

because of her vile self promoting nature and the fact she doesn’t recognize her own failings. Bitchy, abusive, and unwilling to listen to anyone but her own in-crowd.

You can view screen caps of the post here and here

It’s funny because I find myself not actually caring what this person (who mysteriously deleted their account within an hour of posting this) thinks of me when they’re unable to speak to me personally about any issues they may have with me. I recently wrote out a blog post about accusations thrown at me all the time, that I didn’t post in the end; ,However, after this misogynistic and vile attack I think the withheld post fits perfectly, so here it is. Enjoy.

On being a young, female vocal skeptic

If you are less than Thirty years of age then you must accept that you are generally unable to contribute to a discussion or debate because your young age means you do not have the necessary life experience that would make such a contribution worthwhile.
.
Dismissing people and their contribution to a topic or debate will certainly have a positive influence on the next generation whom so many older skeptics agree are those that educational outreach must focus on to pass on the importance of critical thinking. By simply dismissing young people when they try to voice their opinions is a sure way to encourage them to openly question things for the rest of their lives.
.
If you also happen to be female then you must show an interest in the male skeptics around you or people shall start to suspect that there is something terribly wrong with you – like that you might like ladies instead. If you are not publically interested in the array of men around you then you are a gay, a ‘frigid bitch’, or a ‘cock tease’. If you do not feel comfortable, or show an interest in discussing crude sex things around people that you hardly know then you are obviously a gay or frigid bitch and people have every right to discuss this about you. This is just how it is. You must accept this.
.
If you should ever receive abuse from other people and a male comes to your defence in the conversation it is because he wants to get nuddy with you and make hay. It is not possible that he is a friend who is coming to your defense, for he is a man and you are a woman and therefor he wants to do the dirty with you. There are no two ways about it.
When you share your critical thoughts with others, when you voice your opinion and speak your mind do not be under the assumption that it is okay to do this because this is attention seeking behaviour and others will see through your wicked attempt at gaining an ego boost for yourself. By even contemplating writing your thoughts on your blog you are clearly attempting to make a name for yourself and make subjects all about you. Any negative reaction you receive as a result of sharing your thoughts is only deserved and you only have yourself to blame for being young, female and daring to be vocal.
.
The first important lesson you can learn about being a young, female, vocal skeptic (as outlined above) is that you must simply accept from the start that you are an attention seeker whose input cannot be valued because of the few years you have been alive, and any attention you receive as a result of all that you do is your own doing and simply a result of the other person having a penis and not because what you’ve said is valued.
.
The second important lesson for you to learn is that you must never listen to anybody who tells you these things because they’re lying and what they’re telling you if offensive and cruel and not worth the time it takes to read the words involved. People will be hateful, let that be their problem. I do.
.

flattr this!

9 Thoughts on “My saddening experience with r/atheism

  1. Peter Scott on 22 April, 2012 at 9:20 pm said:

    Don’t fret over it. Those of use who read your blogs or listen to your podcasts objectively appreciate your point of view. Don’t forget this is simply a form of ad hominem and therefore a logical fallacy, there is no discussion on their part so the argument is lost before it starts.

    The problem is you are a prominent skeptical podcaster who has called out a number of woo peddlers and they will try to troll as a response. If their only rejoinder is trolling then you must be doing something right.

    Keep up the good work!

  2. Kompani101 on 22 April, 2012 at 9:21 pm said:

    Good article, well said.

  3. Hello Haley, don’t worry about those silly people. They must just be jealous.

    This is Darrel with the Faytteville Freethinkers in Fayetteville Arkansas. I was so inspired by your article in the May/June issue of Skeptical Inquirer that I gave a presentation about it at our April freethinker meeting today (we are the largest skeptic club in our state, have over 430 members and had about 60 in attendance today). We so appreciate your efforts to stand up for what is right we made you “Fayetteville Freethinker of the Month.” Go here to watch a video clip of everyone showing their appreciation after my presentation about you.

    http://fayfreethinkers.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=25316#p25316

    Keep up the good work!

  4. I have never been to r/atheism.
    Blog posts like this one mean I probably never will.
    I do not imagine my life will be massively altered by this decision.

    However, a brief note of caution – you ( and Jen McCreight ) have successfully fed some Trolls. When you rise to trollbait (which this blatantly was) they automatically win. All they are looking for is a response from their Target.

    I’m not saying you should not confront them; however, if you want them to go away, the best response is often not to respond. Rise above it. It is childish playground name-calling. Do you really care what someone you have probably never met has to say about you, especially when they don’t have the balls to at least use their real name.

    IMHO, Blogging about it is just going to encourage them.

  5. You are not alone! This is something from a blog I published TODAY on a completely different topic (still relevant):

    I find that there is always a way to slice the pie so that your experience is not relevant. Oh, you don’t have kids? Oh, you don’t have boys? Oh, your not raising kids NOW? Oh, you never worked? Oh, you never drove across country? Oh, you are young? Oh, you are old? Oh, you are blahblahblah? Sometimes these are relevant and sometimes they are simply protective shields so that you can discount another’s input.

  6. I find it unfortunate that r/atheism is beginning to be seen on blogs and forums as being representative of atheism (this isn’t something you do in this post, it just brought up the topic of r/atheism again). The community there is typical of atheists who are also redditors, a vanishingly small subset of atheists.

    I go to skeptic and atheist events less and less often these days *because* they are dominated by white middle class males. I already know that perspective and gain relatively little new insight from talking with them. I’m more interested in listening to women, LGBT, and ethnic/religious minorities. I have much I can learn from them and it’s frustrating that they aren’t invited to speak or actively recruited to participate more.

  7. Hi Hayley and HIG readers,

    First off, congratulations on being named Faytteville skeptic of the month. If you can make it in Arkansas, you can make it anywhere, just ask Bill Clinton.

    Second, I suppose some people who read this comment will describe me as “one of Hayley’s sycophants” which is not true. I do respect you tremendously and enjoy our Twitter friendship but I’m more than willing to challenge you when I think differently from you. I think this is essential to being a skeptic but, as I’ve written in the past, some people in the “movement” believe that some are above criticism but that you and other women prominent in the “community” should just shut up and take the shit you are being fed by grey haired, potbellied middle aged nerds like me.

    As for your age, I don’t care. You and our very young friend Mr. Morgan are leaders in skepticism and skeptical activism and should be shown the same level of respect as of the older male “talking heads” who seem to never do anything beyond writing the odd blog post but get invited to speak at conference after conference where they recite the same things that they’ve said at events in the past. Rhys’ work on a bizarre “remedy” for Crohn’s disease and the fraudulent Burzynski Clinic and your efforts on Healing On the Streets (HOTS) and various real paranormal investigations demonstrates that you younger people are not just doing important work but are leading the “community” into areas previously unexplored by the movement. Combined, your age plus that of Rhys add up to ten years less than me alone but I would look to either of you for advice on activism before most everyone else in the community.

    People who accuse you of “seeking publicity” obviously don’t know you at all. Since the HOTS story hit, I’ve seen you refuse a number of interviews in the big time mainstream media. All of this extra exposure would certainly have helped you increase your visibility and fame among skeptics and civilians alike if that was your goal. Instead, very graciously, you told the world that your part was done and left the publicity to the same old talking heads.

    Comments people make about your sexuality are completely out of line. Around the skeptics community, I often hear George Hrab do his Q & A sessions and inevitably, someone asks if he and Ms Information are a couple. I never hear anyone ask if Geo and Phil Plate are lovers even though they have both tweeted about sharing a hotel room at conferences. I find the hate filled comments directed at you, Rebecca Watson and other women involved in skepticism so disgusting that I question if this is a community I want to be part of, then, I remember that really good people, of which you are one, are also at the heart of this movement and I grow comfortable again.

    Lastly, the respect and kindness you show people with whom you disagree is a lesson I think everyone involved in skepticism or any other kind of activism can learn from and, yes, you’re a leader in this area as well. While I admit, I can find the mocking of silly ideas very funny, I don’t enjoy hearing individuals bing treated poorly for the beliefs they hold. You, with some of your really awesome interviews on RI, demonstrate how a cordial conversation can occur in this area of interest among people with highly divergent points of view. Certainly, Marsh deserves credit for this too but I find that your commitment to civility can teach everyone in the community a real lot.

    Surely, I can go on and on about your admirable characteristics but I’ll end here as I’ve hit the high points. Remember, no matter what the haters say, Hayley M. Stevens is terrific and I’m sure she will remain so well into the future without becoming a cranky old cynic like me.

    Happy Hacking,
    cdh

  8. Pingback: Tone | The Heresy Club

Leave a Reply

Post Navigation