Fake ghosts: a horror story in Cheltenham

[TRIGGER WARNING: Infant death]

Update: I got in touch with the news paper, read here>>

The Gloucestershire Echo ran a story about a Cheltenham resident, John Gore, who claims to have captured the ghost of a baby on camera in his home. According to John’s neighbour, a previous occupant of his house had a baby that died of cot death so John believes that the ghost he has caught on camera is that baby. You might think that’s a illogical yet fair conclusion for someone to reach – but what if I told you the worst part of this story? What if I told you that the ghost that John captured on camera, that he has associated with this tragic dead baby, is a fake ghost. Would it make your stomach flip angrily too?

Here is the photo from John, that he says was intended as a photo of his cats:

The photo that allegedly shows a ghost of a dead baby

How do I know it is a fake? How am I so sure? Because I have the same app on my iPhone too. Here is the same ghost in my house, haunting my dog Lucky:

The scary thing is that my dog has become quite attached to this ghost:

It was with me at my first ever public talk at a paranormal conference back in 2009:

It even followed me to Preston Manor in Brighton recently, here it is on the Servants staircase:

These photos are a result of the ‘Ghost Capture’ iPhone App by ‘GhostsDontExist‘. It’s a funny app and can be good fun, but there is something sinister about somebody using the app to create a simple fake ghost photo, and parading it around as proof that their house is haunted by the previous occupants dead baby.

That crosses a line from funny to damn disrespectful. I sincerely hope the mother and father who had to experience the sad loss of their child never find out the memory of their baby was used as part of a pathetic ghost gag.

flattr this!

7 Thoughts on “Fake ghosts: a horror story in Cheltenham

  1. I don’t know what’s worse, the JohnTroll for cooking up this sickening nonsense in the first place or TiG for printing it.

    Oh no. Wait a minute. I do. It’s John, isn’t it?

    A bit of a no-brainer.

    I sincerely hope that if the story about the cot death is true, that the parents don’t ever see this.

  2. Pingback: “Baby Ghost” Photo Deconstructed « Unexplained Universe

  3. Susan Ewington on 16 June, 2012 at 2:12 pm said:

    I knew as soon as I saw it yesterday that it was fake, what an absolute idiot to try and pass it off as a baby.
    sickening.

  4. Branwen on 16 June, 2012 at 3:04 pm said:

    Poor Lucky. No, kidding. Every dog would be pleased with a little friend like that.
    I fear ‘John’ does not have friends like that. He should not have anyway. Wan**r. (excuse my French)

  5. Pingback: Study Group America - Capitalism, Socialism & the Politics of Living

  6. There are so many aspects and levels that are disturbing here.

    Lack of objective journalism, namely asking questions before going with a story such as this, considering the sensitive cot death issue before to print. Sensationalism and tragedy sells the most newspapers… :-(

    One has to wonder of the fallout of this, will the house now by investigated by quick to call paranormal investigators, psychics and suchlike?

    • Hayley on 16 June, 2012 at 7:52 pm said:

      I know people on the ground in the local area to this story, and I know they’re keeping an eye on this situation. I am personally contacting the paper on Monday to hopefully chat to the editor about this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Post Navigation